Translate Now

Check out your,

Misconceptions

and some

Great Photos

Too.

Please …

Obama, Media, and the Truth Deficit :: Political News and

www.hyscience.com11/11/11

The idea that a subversive and hostile demagogue like Obama could actually be president is the fault of an out of control media hell bent on 'transforming' America into yet another failed nation under socialism. I might not go

Kuhner: Obama Wants A "Centralized Command-And-Control

mediamatters.org9/23/11

Kuhner: Obama Wants A "Centralized Command-And-Control System" Like "Fascist Leader Benito Mussolini". September 23, 2011 11:36 am ET by Media Matters staff. In his September 22 Washington Times column, Jeffrey Kuhner claimed

Obama checks out how to control the media?

Obama learns the truth - from Pravda

 

 

Is Obama Trying To Control The Media?

Meaning The Radio, Newspapers, Television And The Internet!

There are ever increasing signs that having used the main stream media to bring him to power, and after using the Internet to fund his election campaign, that Obama now intends to put as much of the media under his control as possible.

 

There’s an article about this very subject that appeared back in October 31, 2008 entitled, Would Obama Reign Like Putin?, which raised the specter of Obama attempting to do exactly that.

The Internet

There’s a bill that’s presently be rammed through Congress at breakneck speed that would give Obama sweeping powers to control parts of the Internet.

The bipartisan bill was introduced in the Senate just last week, but it’s already moving quickly through Congress toward passage and the legislation is already generating a very bad buzz on many tech blogs.

It’s not clear to me whether the MSM either approves of the bill or hasn’t yet noticed its passage, either of which would be par for the course for those that brought about Obama’s election.

What Would Obama Be Able To Do?

The bill would grant President Obama the power to declare a "national cyber-emergency" at his discretion and force private companies tied to the Web, including Internet service providers and search engines, to take action in response, which in essence means that he’d be able to limit or even cut off their connections to the World Wide Web for up to 30 days.

What Is The Supposed Purpose Of The Bill?

While the bill’s sponsors say it is intended to create a shield to defend the United States and its largest companies from the growing threat of cyber-attacks, civil-liberties activists fear the bill could give the White House the ability to effectively shut down portions of the Internet for politically inspired reasons.

Gregory Nojeim of the Center for Democracy and Technology noted, "We have seen through recent history that in an emergency, the Executive Branch will interpret grants of power very broadly".

Wayne Crews, who is vice president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, that is a free-enterprise think tank, said he believes the bill is so broadly worded that it might even allow the White House to take aim at whistle-blowing websites that were believed to pose a national-security threat, such as WikiLeaks, in the guise of a "cyber-emergency."

What Is WikiLeaks?

WikiLeaks, which nominally based in Sweden, publishes and comments on leaked documents alleging government and corporate misconduct.

It is preparing to post a classified Pentagon video depicting an American airstrike in Afghanistan last year that left as many as one hundred and forty people dead, most of them children and teenagers.

Obama would of course certainly love to be able to stop the video from being posted.

Who Introduced The Bill?

The Protecting Cyberspace Act was introduced by Senator Joseph Lieberman, the Connecticut independent who is chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, and Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the panel’s ranking Republican.

Counterparts in the House Homeland Security Committee have endorsed identical legislation, meaning that a final bill could be adopted by the full Congress within weeks.

Lieberman’s committee spokeswoman, Leslie Phillips, said the bill was an effort to defend the nation’s most important electronic networks, "the networks that are most central to our daily lives, and not at attacking anything", and she was particularly agitated at any suggestion that the bill might give the White House the opportunity to try to shut down individual websites on national-security grounds.

"In no way is the senator’s cyber-security legislation directed at websites, not WikiLeaks or anyone else’s".

MSM – Radio, Newspapers And TV

Meanwhile, Jon Leibowitz, who is the chairman of Obama’s Federal Trade Commission, is spearheading an agenda that would allow news organizations to be subsidized, which would most likely be a first step toward government control of the media.

Among the measures under consideration are special tax treatment, exemption from antitrust laws and changes in copyright laws.

A May 24, working paper on "reinventing" the media proposes that the government impose fees on websites such as the Drudge Report that link to news websites or that it tax consumer electronics such as iPads, laptops and Kindles and the funds raised by these levies would be redistributed to traditional media outlets, and these are of course exactly the kind of subsidies that could and would trigger government oversight and control.

The White House has already openly and passionately attacked Fox News and raised the question as to whether it is "a news organization or an arm of the Republican Party?".

Radio stations already squirm when their licenses come up for renewal before the F.C.C. (Federal Communications Commission) and one can easily imagine news organizations pulling their punches so as not to alienate the new hand that feeds them.

Related posts:

  1. Does Obama Want To Control The Internet?
  2. Is The Internet A Human Right?
  3. The Main Stream Media Failed
  4. More Than Eighty Reasons Why Obama Shouldn’t Be Reelected!
  5. Obama, a stranger in our midst …

3 Responses to “Does Obama Want To Control The Media? Including The Internet?!”

  • Mac-the-knife says:

    Julius Genachowski, who was hand-picked by President Barack Obama to chair the FCC, told The Wall Street Journal in February 2010, “I’ve been clear repeatedly that we’re not going to regulate the Internet".

    But his actions suggest otherwise!

    Since taking office in June 2009, Genachowski, who is a tech entrepreneur and former FCC counsel, has led the commission on an unprecedented quest for power over the Web’s network infrastructure, sparking a thunderous, confusing lobbying battle over who gets to control the Net. 

    Republican, Robert McDowell, who is one of five appointees who run the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) becomes effusive when talking about the World Wide Web, “The beauty of the Internet is that it has been somewhat lawless and the lack of government mandates has made the Net the greatest deregulatory success story of all time, and a sort of libertarian heaven".

    “If the government starts to get involved with regulation of Internet network management", McDowell warns, “you’ll start to see the politicization of decisions in that realm, and at this point, there’s no if about it. From his first major speech to a hurried and secretive rulemaking procedure in the final weeks of 2010, Genachowski has made it his mission to plant the seeds of government control within the core of the Internet and all under the guise of preserving Internet freedom".

  • Pacifism-Wins says:

    Obama wants to kill the Internet to prevent you from having the freedom that is guaranteed you by the Bill of Rights…..Amendment #1.

    He has shown himself to be nothing more than a tin horn despot that deserves no respect from the people he claims to represent.

    The only saving grace I can see in all of this is that he will be a one term president and most of what he espoused and has undertaken will be reversed by a more intelligent successor.
    Tired

  • Anony Mouse says:

    Reporting from Ft. Meade, Md.—
    Appearing in a military courtroom for the first time Friday, Army Pfc. Bradley Manning said “yes” when asked if he understood the charges against him in a case that involves one of the largest national security breaches in U.S. history.

    Manning’s civilian lawyer quickly brought the pretrial proceeding to a temporary halt, however, when he filed a motion seeking removal of the presiding military officer because he works as a federal prosecutor in civilian life.

    Manning’s attorneys said Army Reserve Lt. Col. Paul Almanza is a full-time prosecutor in the child exploitation and obscenity section of the criminal division of the Department of Justice.

    The Justice Department is investigating if anyone assisted Manning when he allegedly downloaded more than half a million classified U.S. documents to his computer, and then transferred them to the WikiLeaks website, where many were later posted online, said Manning’s civilian defense attorney David E. Coombs.

    “A reasonable person looking from the outside would say clearly the investigating officer is biased,” Coombs said.

Leave a Reply

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

[+] Zaazu Emoticons Zaazu.com
Google Search
Custom Search
Categories
Archives
No sign-up needed to respond to posts!
Login

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner