Our Changing Globe » gaza

Obama Will Err If He Tries To Prove A Nuclear Iran-Palestinian Linkage

Michael Redbourn — Mon, 18 May 2009 11:49:14 +0000

When President Obama welcomes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House today, Obama will most likely propose that Israel be a test of Iran’s readiness to halt its pursuit of nuclear weapons.

He won’t put it in such blunt terms of course, but will talk of the supposed linkage that exists between Israel making peace with the Palestinians, and Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Obama will unsuccessfully try to prove, that there is a connection between an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement, and Iran’s mullahs giving up their quest for nuclear weapons.

If Obama takes this tack, which is he expected to, he will fail miserably because there is no connection whatsoever between the two issues, and Netanyahu will correctly remain unconvinced.

Obama may then try gentle pressure, which is the most that he can use, but the facts are clear and Obama surely knows them and will respect Netanyahu’s rejection.

Did Iran set out to get nuclear weapons in order to help the Palestinians get a State? Of course not.

Has Iran even faintly suggested that it will halt its pursuit of nuclear weapons if the Palestinians get a State. Never.

Abbas controls nothing, and can hardly order a pizza.

He would lose the West Bank to Hamas in a matter of weeks if Israel were to hand it over to him, and Hamas stated as recently as yesterday that it will never recognize Israel.

So who is Israel supposed to hold peace talks with, and who is it supposed to concede land to?

Where would this new State be, and who would control it?

What is more, even under Abbas’s moderate guidance, Palestinian children are still raised on a diet of hatred in their schools, and specially made cartoons and videos that glorify dying a martyr’s death and others that show Jews drinking babies blood are common place.

There are presently fifty seven Islamic states, but Abbas is recently on record as saying that he will “never accept Israel as a Jewish state”.

Some in the U.S. would like to coerce Israel into some sort of two state deal, simply to see how Iran would respond, since there is not much appetite for either an Iran with nuclear bombs or launching an attack against it at the present time.

Netanyahu is a seasoned politician however, and knowing that Obama cannot force him, he will refuse to allow Israel to be used as a guinea pig.

Share|

Was Israel’s Decision To Attack Gaza Correct?

Michael Redbourn — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:22:00 +0000

The short answer to the question, “Was Israel’s Decision To Attack Gaza Correct?” is an unqualified ‘yes’ because Israel’s government had no alternative.

Prior to Israel’s attack on Gaza, Hamas had indiscriminately launched over 3,000 rockets and mortar bombs onto Israeli civilian centers and that was in just 2008, so under the circumstances the Israeli military response was not merely a necessary one, it was the only one available.

Even the Israeli author Amos Oz who is despised and loathed by the vast majority of Israelis because of his extreme left wing and pacifist views recently said in an opinion piece entitled ‘Israel Must Defend Its Citizens’, “The systematic bombing of the citizens in Israel’s towns and cities is a war crime and a crime against humanity”, but he should have gone much further and written that Hamas is also violating the fundamental human rights of the vast majority of Arabs living in the strip and would like to expand its violations to those living in the West Bank as well.

In direct contravention of international law, Hamas uses civilians as human shields and uses their homes, schools and community centers as launching pads for its missiles and does so not only to make it difficult for Israel to respond but because it actually wants Gazans to be injured and killed so that gruesome pictures and videos can be released causing Israel to be demonized.

Hamas took control of the strip by way of a violent coup d’etat and ruthlessly killed and tortured many fellow Arabs including shooting them in the backs of the knees in order to make their kneecaps pop out! It has embraced Iran, repressed women, closed internet cafes, burned books and is doing all in its power to return life in the strip to the 6th century. It has caused most Western countries and many Arab ones too, to shun it, thereby depriving the citizens of much aid that they would have otherwise have received.

The commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ took place last month and difficult questions were raised that related to Darfur, Zimbabwe and many other places that have governments that violate the human rights of their citizens and it would now seem time to add Hamas to the list of the shameful!

Share|

Will Hamas’s Strategy of Escalation Succeed?

Michael Redbourn — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:41:00 +0000

The Israeli attack on the Gaza Strip enters its fourth day today with over 350 Arabs purportedly dead and over 600 wounded and figures from all sources with the exception of Hamas imply that the vast majority of casualties were Hamas affiliated. After three days of non-denial Hamas announced today that the policemen that were hit within the first 3-4 minutes of the initial attack were simple policemen doing their jobs and were not affiliated with Hamas.

Israel’s Air Force chief said Monday night, “The army is ready to go all the way” and Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Gabriela Shalev, also said on Monday, “the operation will continue as long as necessary until it completely destroys Hamas” and went on to say that “Israel would like to see its negotiating partner, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, regain control of Gaza”.

The attack began soon after Hamas, which is on the terror list of most Western countries, allowed a quasi-cease-fire to lapse and began firing more rockets into Israel. “Quasi” meaning that kassams were continually fired at Israel during the previous six months although Hamas always claimed that other groups were responsible.

After the supposed cease-fire between Hamas and Israel ended on Dec. 19, dozens of rockets landed inside Israel, killing one civilian last week and another, an Arab-Israeli, on Monday.

For several weeks, the threats voiced by Israeli politicians were loud and unambiguous and only last Wednesday, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert issued a stark warning to the Palestinians in an interview with an Arab TV channel and, “Stop it now, or Israel will respond with violence to the rocket launchers and their backers” was the essence of his message.

A closer look suggests that the attack was intentionally provoked by Hamas which knew that that Israel could not tolerate the relentless cross-border rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip indefinitely and the grisly television pictures that were beamed around the world following the Israeli air raids appear to have been part of its plan. It would appear that the Hamas leadership not only accepted the likelihood that many Palestinian civilians would be hurt following an Israeli attack but were, and are actually counting on it.

Why?

Hamas hopes the current escalation of violence will make the West take it seriously as a negotiating partner but the carnage that it willfully incited will mostly likely have occurred in vain because the Arabs in Gaza and those in the West bank are too politically divided. Abbas for example, condemned the attacks but also blamed Hamas, “We talked to them (Hamas) and we told them ‘please, we ask you, do not end the truce. Let the truce continue and not stop’, so we could have avoided what happened”, and Egypt too considers Hamas to be responsible.

Arabs that were displaced after the various wars with Israel are scattered across the Middle East and their politics fall across the whole political spectrum with some being ready to fight and die to achieve their goal of an Israel free Middle East whilst others seek peace with their Jewish neighbors, and meanwhile the two dominant Palestinian parties, Hamas and Fatah are united only by their hate for one another.

Share|