Our Changing Globe

Posts Tagged ‘government’

The top 10 recipients of the government’s $700 billion financial bailout plan (TALF) paid lobbyists around $9.5 million during the first three months of this year.

GM (General Motors Corp.) which just announced that it will most likely default on a $1 billion bond payment that’s due June 1, spent $2.8 million on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009.

GM has already received $13.4 billion in government loans and is pushing for an additional $5 billion.

Other bailout recipients that spent more than $1million in an attempt to influence future government decisions were;

• A.I.G – which has already received $70 billion
• Citigroup Inc. – 45 billion
• JPMorgan Chase & Co. – $25 billion
• Bank of America Corp., received $5 billion and spent $660,000 on lobbying which is 20% down from the last quarter of 2008.
• Wells Fargo & Company, $25 billion in bailout money, and $700,000 on lobbying.
• Goldman Sachs, received $10 billion and spent $670,000
• Morgan Stanley got $10 billion and spent $540,000
• U.S. Bancorp got $6.6 billion and paid out $170,000
• PNC Financial Services Group, received $7.8 billion and spent $135,000 which is almost double its last quarter’s lobbying costs.

The companies in question deny using bailout money for lobbying, but seven of them spent more attempting to influence the government than they did in the last quarter of 2008, and Craig Holman of the watchdog group Public Citizen said “It’s completely unjustifiable. They say they’re not using public money for these purposes, but in effect these companies are steering taxpayer funds to lobbying, and campaign contributions”, and added, “What AIG’s reporting is, in fact, influence peddling”.

Although the Federal Reserve finalized new regulations that will limit various credit-card rate increases last December, the rules won’t come into effect until July 2010, and there is now mounting pressure to implement the regulations at a much earlier date.

Not surprisingly, the banking industry says that both the White House and Congress should wait for the Fed’s new rules to take effect before taking any additional action, and Edward Yingling, who is president of the American Bankers Association, said last Sunday, “The banking industry understands the concerns about credit cards, but the administration should fully recognize the impact of the Federal Reserve Board regulation, which is one of the strongest consumer protection regulations ever adopted. As we go forward we need to be careful about piling on rules that very much may have the impact of restraining the availability of credit”.

Democratic lawmakers have already begun advancing legislation that would limit certain credit card fees and other practices and Larry Summers, who is scheduled to meet with the heads of several of the largest U.S. credit card issuers at the White House on Thursday, recently said on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’, “The president is going to be very focused, in a very near term, on a whole set of issues having to do with credit-card abuses”, and then added, “their abuses include charging consumers extraordinarily high rates that they wouldn’t have paid if they knew what they were getting themselves into”.

Summers’s comments were also underlined by White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki who said, “Addressing abuse in the credit card industry and standing up for consumers is a priority for the president and his economic team, and we look forward to working with Congress on these issues”.

Whereas banks claim that market conditions and changes in borrowers’ credit scores necessitated the increases, consumer advocates want new legislation that would not only limit rate increases on existing balances, but would also require credit card companies to provide more information on their rates, and they are particularly critical of banks that raised interest rates whilst receiving federal bailout funds.