Our Changing Globe

Posts Tagged ‘presidential elections’

An article that I read yesterday sent a cold shiver down my spine …

Is Obama Secretly Sensible?

It was similar in vein to something that I wrote earlier in the month entitled “The World Will Be Very Different In 2009” but it caused me to ponder what Obama really wants and what changes he really has in mind for America.

I went to bed thinking about his about his 30 minute infomercial that aired across network and cable television last night and woke up believing that I finally understood what Obama really wants.

He doesn’t want to be just another President of the United States and he really does want to bring about enormous changes!

If elected, he would want to rein like Putin!

Very few Americans understand what life under a Putin like regime would be like but members of the “New Party” that helped Obama and others to rise through the political ranks know exactly what it means and they have worked for years to bring about its implementation.
If Obama is elected we can envisage as many changes as possible being made as quickly as possible to ensure that the United States would effectively have a one party system, and many of those changes are already being planned for as written about in The Fairness Doctrine.

Russia supposedly has Democracy and most Russians will tell you that they have one, but did the power behind the throne change when Dmitry Medvedev was elected last March?

In 1787 a Scottish professor by the name of Alexander Fraser Tyler wrote about the fall of the ‘Athenian Republic’ which occurred more than 2000 years ago.

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.”

“The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith
From spiritual faith to great courage
From courage to liberty
From liberty to abundance
From abundance to complacency
From complacency to apathy
From apathy to dependence
From dependence back again into bondage”.

Do his words signal the end of a cycle for America?

Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » Communists Lead “Occupy Los …

www.trevorloudon.com10/10/11

Unlike the anarchists and lunatic leftists, who run the “Occupy” movement in most cities, the Communist Party USA is disciplined and highly focused on returning Barack Obama and the Democrats to complete power in 2012. …

Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » Communism is Dying? 80 Million …

www.trevorloudon.com9/21/11

Now the Communist Party has returned to Classic Marxism, moving from feudalism, to very tightly controlled “capitalism,” which will lead according to Marx, onto socialism, then communism. The good Leninists of the Communist Party of China well understand the dangers that “capitalism” could … so that they could stay connected with the Party. Does this sound like a dying organization to you? Order Trevor Loudon's new book: 'Barack Obama and the Enemies Within' …

---

Evidence has just emerged that Sen. Barack Obama was a member of a far left socialist party in 1996 whose aim was to help get people elected to office that would then move the Democratic Party further to the left.

The ‘New Party’ which was formed by members of the ‘Democratic Socialists for America’ and leaders of an offshoot of the ‘Community Party USA’ was an electoral alliance that worked alongside the ‘Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now’ – ACORN.

Following claims on several blog-sites that he had been a member of the ‘New Party’, Obama’s campaign responded to the allegations by saying that “he’d never been a member”.

But a site by the name of ‘New Zeal’ uncovered copies of the party’s official newspaper, ‘New Party News’ that show Obama posing with ‘New Party’ leaders who list him as a ‘New Party’ member and even include quotes from him. The blog is number 41 on their site and if you have any problems getting to the site it’s because at the time of writing they’d had 30,000 hits in just 48 hours.

This irrefutable documentation is explosive both because it shows Obama’s ties to the extreme left and also because there was once again an attempted cover up. This news comes on the heels of an announcement that Obama’s fundraising slowed in October to about a half of its September pace. Obama reported raising $36 million for his campaign during the first two weeks of October but spent more than $105 million during that same period.

The New Party’s Spring 1996 newspaper stated: “New Party members won three other primaries this Spring in Chicago: Barack Obama (State Senate), Michael Chandler (Democratic Party Committee) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary) and quoted Obama as saying “these victories prove that small ‘d’ democracy can work”.

The ‘New Party’ which was established in 1992 took advantage of what was known as “electoral fusion” which meant that candidates could run on two tickets concurrently thereby attracting voters from both parties, but after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court the ‘New Party’ became non-operational in 1998.

Many of the New Party’s founding members were ‘Democratic Socialists for America’ leaders, and members of ‘Committees of Correspondence’ which was a breakaway of the ‘Communist Party USA’ and Obama attended several DSA events and meetings, including a DSA-sponsored town hall meeting on Feb. 25, 1996, entitled “Employment and Survival in Urban America” and he sought and received an endorsement from the DSA.

Whether the MSM will jump on this or not remains to be seen but it would seem impossible to hush it up and it is almost certain that Fox and others will carry the story.

10/25/08

Having read the comments to this article I felt the need to add a general reply.

I have said it in some of my blogs, but let me repeat it here.

I am not a McCain supporter and I wish the republican party had been able to field a better choice.

My problem is not with Obama’s religion, whatever it might be, nor whether or not he is a communist.

My difficulty with Obama is that he has has purposely and very cleverly concealed vast amounts of his past and it is this concealment that lead to my first blog, The Missing Paper Trail.

If I found ‘new’ information about McCain I would publish it here immediately.

I believe a vote for Obama is dangerous because he has not been forthright about his past and when confronted with legitimate but politically dangerous questions he simply issues denials and if proof is then forthcoming he quickly “passes the buck”.

I was an active communist in my 20s and can easily see the attraction.

I now share an apartment with two people from the former Soviet Union and have learned through them and their friends what life was like in Communist regimes and it is not something that is knowable without having lived it.

In short, I believe that Obama should come clean about his past and his beliefs and reveal them to the Nation.

If the population then chooses him then it will get the government that it deserves.

As to comments that relate to conspiracy theories, I can only say that I see nothing in this article that suggest a ‘conspiracy’. A man joins a left wing group that wants to move the Democratic Party left. The group promotes promising individuals and some of them get elected to high office and do indeed move the party left. I see nothing wrong with having joined the group nor with what the group did.

As far as comments suggesting that what is contained in my article and/or on other blog sites is fantasy, the posters only needed to go to “New Zeal” to see what is there.

Are the news cuttings displayed there real?

Of course I don’t’ know 100% but it would seem almost beyond doubt that they are and hopefully the MSM will quickly confirm or deny their authenticity.

Of course there is misleading information on the web and some of it is intentional and some of it is unintentional but the same goes for every form of media and all that one can do is to try and establish the truth or falsity of what one is reading.